Obscure Web Page

If you think the humans have a chance of emerging from the intellectual dark ages any time soon, you are dreaming, and your dream is being thoroughly enjoyed by somebody else, for its entertainment.

Stand the cross section of humanity on the stage, in front of the cameras, including all the political, military, other government and citizen organization folks, and they will ascribe their names in public to their expressed desire to live in a peaceful society, where their children can grow and live in freedom and prosperity, in those words and others like them.

In fact they have created and dedicated countless institutions pursuing that goal, whole governments and citizen organizations openly espousing that goal, a country where knowledge flourishes, and crime and destructive acts have been eliminated or reduced their lowest possible level.

Hmmm, so, it becomes a bit obvious that all those governments and citizen organizations have failed. The proof is manifest.

The same ancient tired old lies of the government leaders and citizen organization leaders continue to fool fools, generation after generation after generation, ongoing today, supporting the first sentence of this web page.

And throughout all this time there have been individuals normally functioning within societies, casually saying: "Hey, I can convey to you the knowledge of how to efficiently solve all the social problems."

Now, this is a test of your intellectual ability, although more accurately described as a test of precisely how you trained your mind......

If you were a leader or member of any government or citizen organization who espoused a peaceful, prosperous society where your children could live in freedom, where wars were not used to resolve contradictions, or if you were anyone else who espoused those goals, in a society where all the government and citizen organization leaders have obviously failed in that regard, would it not be most logical to listen to the individuals who say they can tell you how to efficiently manifest those goals?

Might that be more logical if those individuals routinely stated more accurate descriptions of the problems, such as, that those social problems are merely arrays of individual human-caused contradictions that could be individually resolved to in sum solve the problem?

And if those individuals said they could answer every related question anyone could ask, and verify the answer against any questions, would that not be something noticeably different from the failing government officials and organization leaders who rhetorically tap dance, skate, slither, squirm away, and just plan refuse to answer every question of their laughable failings?

Would you not be able to ask a half dozen or so questions that would easily determine if the individual's claims held substance, indicating a genuine possibility of the existence of the referenced knowledge?

Between an individual who verifiably answers your questions, and a government or organization leader who waffles and mealy mouths non-answer rhetorical illusions in response to your questions, who are you going to further question and listen to, to learn useful knowledge?

Between an individual claiming the ability and desire to accurately answer questions, and a question-dodging government person claiming all the good that government claims, which of the two can answer the following questions, therefore actually resolve the identified contradiction, with their name on public record, and verify their answer against any questions?

1. Without changing the dictionary meanings of the words, is it possible to have a government of the people, by the people and for the people, if the government keeps secrets from the people?

Obviously the answer is, No, to which any commonly intelligent individual would ascribe their name on public record to identify their intellectual ability and literacy. Obviously government people and their public school teachers, for public record with their name, cannot answer the question. For an identifiable reason they simply do not know how to use words that hold their meanings, and thus do not know how to use language for the useful task of its invention, that is, conveying recognizable and useful knowledge among people.

The US government, claiming to be of the people, by the people and for the people, is using the people's tax money to create more and more secrets, and is ever-more desperately attempting to keep vast volumes of secrets from the people. The people, not the government chaps, paid for the knowledge constituting those secrets. The knowledge therefore belongs to the people. Because that knowledge is openly recognized as secrets being kept from the people, any people who suggest that the US government is of the people, by the people and for the people, such as most of the government's public school teachers and news media, are just plain thoroughly stupid people who cannot understand the common definitions of words, and who are probably teaching their children to also be that dumb.

If the government chaps wish to retain their power to keep secrets from the people, the resolution to the revealed contradiction is easy. Simply stop claiming to have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Concurrently demand that the government's public school teachers teach the students that they are under a government of the government, by the government and for the government.

If the latter is not possible without the citizens removing the government people from their jobs, the government people need only stop keeping secrets from the people, a laughably easy task that dramatically improves the government and society in contrast to the therefore idiot governments who still define their citizens as enemies by keeping secrets from them.

2. If a politician is caught lying, as usual, and his political party officers refuse to publicly rescind the party's recognition of his party membership or representation, with that refusal therefore identifying the party as represented by liars, and therefore representing liars (dishonest people), is it possible to successfully claim to be an honest person if one votes for any politicians of that party?

If a person wishes to continue to vote for representatives of the verifiably dishonest political parties, who therefore represent dishonest voters, the resolution to the revealed contradiction is easy. Simply stop claiming to be honest. Such a person need only openly state in public that he is dishonest, and perceives that useful social goals can be achieved by lying to everyone, fooling fools forever, including that person's own children if they raised their children to be so stupid they can forever be fooled with lies.

If instead you wish to establish your personal integrity as being an honest person, simply stop voting for the US DemocanRepublicrats who are obviously lying if their lips are moving or if they apply ink to paper or pixels to computer screens. Every day a greater percentage of people who belatedly figure it out, stop voting for the lying DemocanRepublicrat Regime. There is no rational reason to vote for people who are lying to you. There is no rational reason to define yourself as a dishonest person in public and among your family, by voting for a fundamentally dishonest political party to represent you. It is not possible for humans to sustain lies (contradictions). All contradictions ultimately fail, by design and definition of contradictions. The attempt to sustain them is a fool's quest of the fools who get government jobs and the fools who support government liars.

If a politician wants to be honest, he need only always tell the truth and not be a member of a fundamentally dishonest political party. If he will therefore not get elected, he is in a society that is too ignorant to elect honest representatives in government. No problem. The society is simply yet too primitive for an honest government, and deserves the inherent damages of attempting to sustain contradictions. The contradiction is easily resolved. A politician job is not worth being dishonest, that is, being too stupid to figure out that contradictions (lies) are not sustainable anyway. There is no imperative to get a government job, except in the illusions of fundamentally dishonest, power-damaged minds.

3. (There are countless more simple questions that reveal contradictions that thinking individuals can easily resolve from the information in the questions, revealing themselves to be useful sources of knowledge to resolve more complex arrays of socially damaging contradictions. Government and citizen organization leaders simply cannot answer those questions, and slither away from answers by offering endless arrays of rhetorical illusions.)

If, between a person offering the same old obvious government and organizational activity lies, failing the goals, and in contrast a person who openly offers to accurately answer your every question, and verify the answer (to the extent of his available time), would it not be most logical to listen to him and question him rather than waste your time and money with failing government and citizen organization leaders?

Well, look around at the comedy of the humans. The people who endorse the above mentioned goals of a peaceful and prosperous society are listening to, applauding, praising, sending money, working for and doing what they can to advance the government and organization leaders who also espouse those goals while they and their processes have been failing those goals since the first government and citizen organization leaders became leaders.

Keep looking, more carefully. If you are perceptive and encounter the opportunity, notice that if those people who say they want a peaceful and prosperous society encounter an individual saying he knows how to manifest those goals, those people ignore him, smile at best, do not listen to him, do not ask any questions, certainly do not support or facilitate him in any way, and most often denigrate or ridicule him as being a crackpot, crazy, rhetorically rambling and anything else derogatory. They openly suggest that nobody listen to such individuals. Perhaps read that again, objectively, considering the contradiction those people make evident.

Those people will then turn back to their listening to, applauding, praising, sending money, working for and doing what they can to advance the government and organization leaders who also espouse those goals while they and their processes have been obviously lying and failing those goals since the first government and citizen organization leaders became leaders.

If a majority of a society is in general too ignorant to even recognize their own contradictions, and therefore certainly farther from asking effective questions of their contradictions, whose obvious answers could resolve the contradictions, that society is still too primitive to produce offspring of any less abject ignorance. And if that is the case even while individuals are openly revealing the contradictions in plain language, laugh yourself to tears at any suggestion that the society retains even rational hope.

But wait. There is more. Look more carefully if you encounter such a situation, and you will notice that the people around that individual will actively offer a vast array of distractions, other things to do, request for assistance with this and that and no end of etceteras, so he never has time to seriously work on doing what he says he can do with his knowledge to advance society out of its intellectual dark ages.

If the above is true, and it is elsewhere verifiable if you do not recognize it from the obvious social condition and individuals among it, after the test of time throughout history involving billions of vastly diverse people producing the same illogical actions with the same unpleasant social results of war, crime, government oppression of human rights, economic difficulties and a gaggle of undesirable etceteras, the reason is obviously a designed feature of the human mind.

Now, with that obvious knowledge, if that same individual also keeps mentioning that the solutions to the social problems are learned with the knowledge that also explains the design of the human mind, would not a logical person be curious?

Allow these words to suggest that even with the immediately above suggestion openly stated at the time, nobody is genuinely curious. They react as above described, ignoring the words, and distracting the individual with every other this or that to do, and sending their votes and money to political parties that are lying to them.

That yet again, against an even more obvious test, demonstrates the designed (and learnable) aspect of the human mind that intentionally keeps the humans in the intellectual dark ages, killing each other in wars, imprisoning each other in prisons, stealing each other's money and productivity with government taxation and bureaucratic process, citizen organization leaders fooling fools out of their money to only sustain citizen organization leaders fooling fools out of their money, squandering their time and money on everything except any process to manifest their most fundamental social desires for their offspring.

So if you encounter one of those individuals, your related action as an individual is your choice. Learn how to ask effective questions. Ask them. Question the answers. Teach your children the same skill, or they will be as dumb as the people who just keep voting for DemocanRepublicrats, and never ask themselves any questions of their glaring contradictions.

But it can be guaranteed by the learnable design of the human mind that no government or organization leader followed by fools will choose to listen and ask questions.

Enjoy the show.

The above words offer their own reasoning within the common meanings of the words, black pixels on a light colored screen, with no ability to be more or less useful with a human name attached to them. Their only value is in the questions you ask of them, and your answers that you question and answer and question. The knowledge you seek is in your mind's questions, not the answers, by design of your mind.